Home » Corrupting the Image » Part Four: Genetics of the Incarnation
Part Four: Genetics of the Incarnation

Part Four: Genetics of the Incarnation

The Genesis prophecy spoke of the coming of two seeds one of the Messiah, the Christ and the other the Antichrist.  In order for us to see how the enemy plans on raising up the Antichrist, we must first understand the genetics of the incarnation of the Lord Jesus (we will look at the genetics of the Antichrist in a later post).

The Virgin Will Conceive

Examining Scripture we see that there are many references to Jesus the Messiah as having been connected genetically (through the seed) to David. While it is true that the Bible records two genealogies of Jesus (Matthew’s account gives Jesus’ line through his adoptive father, Joseph) [i] we learn from the Lukan account, that Jesus is a blood descendant of David by way of Mary’s line.

Nevertheless, there are some commentators who suggest that Mary acted as an incubator and there was therefore no genetic connection between her and the Lord, or between Him and humanity.

To suggest that Jesus’ physical body was a completely unique and new creation and not connected to Mary and hence David, Abraham and Adam is to ignore the enormity of verses which attest to the contrary. Let’s first start with the announcement of the miraculous birth of Jesus made by the angel Gabriel in Luke 1:31-35.

And behold, you will conceive [sullepse συλληψη] in your womb [gastri γαστρι] and bring forth a Son, and shall call His name JESUS. […] and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David […]” Then Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I do not know a man?” And the angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon [epeleusetai επελευσεται] you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God, (emphasis mine).

While this passage is well known, there are several factors that we need to focus in on to see conclusively that Mary did not simply act as an incubator for the Lord, but that she was in fact his mother on the genetic level as well. Grasping this important point will give us clarity as we consider the implications of Genesis 3:15. First of all, we note that Mary was a virgin and had “not known a man”. The angel tells her that she will conceive and then give birth to a son. Notice that the angel does not merely say that she will give birth to a son, but that she will conceive (sullambano συλλαμβάνω). This is the same language that is used in the well-known verse of Isaiah 7:14 “[…] Behold, the virgin shall conceive [hara הָרָה֙] and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel.” The Hebrew word hara הָרָה֙ is used 57 times in the Hebrew Bible and carries the normative meaning of the word. Basically stated, it is when a child is procreated from the sexual union of a man and woman – that is, it takes two to conceive. Let’s consider just a few examples:

  • Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived [hara הָרָה֙] and bore Cain, (Genesis 4:1)
  • And Cain knew his wife, and she conceived [hara הָרָה֙] and bore Enoch, (Genesis 4:17)
  • So he went in to Hagar, and she conceived [hara הָרָה֙], (Genesis 16:4)
  • For Sarah conceived [hara הָרָה֙] and bore Abraham a son, (Genesis 21:2)
  • So the woman conceived [hara הָרָה֙] and bore a son, (Exodus 2:2)

The implantation of the man’s seed is not enough; the woman provides her genetic information (seed) as well. In modern terms this is referring to the reproductive cells, called gametes [iii] which are the seed of the man (sperm) and the seed of the woman (ovum). Today we understand that the mother’s ovum and father’s sperm each provide half of the information (each providing 23 individual [i.e. haploid] chromosomes) to the zygote (fertilized egg or child) for a total of 46 individual chromosomes. To speak of a woman’s seed is extremely precise language (which only serves to authenticate the Bible as being from God). Thus to speak of the virgin or Mary conceiving means that her ovum (egg) absolutely must account for half of the chromosomes which Jesus’ physical body was comprised of. That being the case then Jesus was genetically connected to his mother Mary and hence his ancestors David, Judah, Jacob, Isaac, Abraham, Shem, Noah, all the way back to Adam.

What is Biblical Seed?

We know for certain from other Scriptures that when the biblical authors talked about seed (Hebrew zera זֶרַע and Greek sperma σπερμα) they were clearly talking about gametes (the reproductive material). Two of the most prominent deserve our attention: After the destruction of Sodom and the loss of their mother, Lot’s two daughters saw the need to preserve their father’s seed. We read:

And it came to pass on the morrow, that the firstborn said unto the younger, Behold, I lay yesternight with my father: let us make him drink wine this night also; and go thou in, [and] lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father, (Genesis 19:34 KJV).

The second of the two is perhaps as blatant as can be concerning just what is meant by seed: “And if any man’s seed [zara זֶרַע] of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even,” (Leviticus 15:16).

In summary, we note that the Scriptures are replete with statements that Jesus would come from the seed of Abraham and his descendants. If the Bible is this specific about the male seed, we ought not to question the Bible when it makes reference to the woman’s seed in Genesis 3:15. Therefore the incarnation of Jesus required that He be connected to humanity genetically yet without sin.

The Genetics of the The Word Becoming Flesh

The incarnation of Jesus was nothing less than the genetic combination of the celestial (Holy Spirit) and the terrestrial (Mary). We must stress, however, that Jesus as the second person of the Godhead existed from eternity past (Micah 5:2) and did not begin to exist at the Holy Spirit’s overshadowing of Mary – He is eternal and has always existed. Nevertheless, the incarnation (becoming flesh) was at the point of conception which was when the Holy Spirit mingled seed (DNA i.e. information) with humanity. After waiting four thousand years the promise of the seed of the woman would be fulfilled. From the point of the incarnation God would begin the process of redeeming mankind that so long ago had sinned and corrupted the Image of God as well as losing the ability to commune with God. This pivotal moment would then find its fulfillment in the crucifixion and resurrection of this God-man thereby giving men the right to become children of God once more.

Just What Is a Seed?

Our understanding of genetics and information technology (IT) helps to better understand what it means that we were and are corrupted. The reality is that our DNA is in fact the source code of humanity and it is the essence of the “seed” that Scripture so often talks about. The term seed is in modern terms called a gamete which in the male is the sperm and in the female is the ovum. Thus when Mary conceived it meant that her ovum provided 23 chromosomes and hence the Holy Spirit provided the other gamete (23 chromosomes). While it is possible that the Holy Spirit provided actual “sperm”, it is unlikely. Sperm (from the male) would be likened to a missile which is carrying a warhead. The warhead is what causes the explosion and the missile simply gets it to the destination. It is not the carrying mechanism which is truly significant for conception, but the “payload” – that is the genetic material (information) that the sperm is carrying. Thus the Holy Spirit provided the 23 chromosomes without the carrying mechanism. Given that the Holy Spirit (the third person of the Godhead) came upon her, there could not have been any need for millions of seed. The Holy Spirit must have placed only one gamete (or set of 23 chromosomes) directly into Mary’s ovum, which necessarily resulted in the body for the Lord Jesus. [iv]

Our Genetic Code

When most of us come to a computer, we are interested in the applications that we can use to help us do our work, surf the internet, play games or watch movies. Underlying those processes is a code that is written with ones and zeros. All of the applications are reduced to a binary (base two) code which a machine can understand. Even the most sophisticated computer program is reduced to a series of ones and zeros. In every living creature there is a coded message that is not a base two but a base four code known as DNA. Dr. Gitt in his book In the Beginning Was Information describes how DNA is a store of information:

The storage medium is the DNA molecule (deoxyribonucleic acid) which resembles a double helix. A DNA fiber is only about two millionths of a millimeter thick, so that it is barely visible with an electron microscope. The chemical letters A, G, T, and C are located on this information tape, and the amount of information is so immense in the case of human DNA that it would stretch from the North Pole to the equator if it was typed on paper, using standard letter sizes. [v]

This storage medium is capable of copying itself with astounding precision as Dr. Gitt explains:

The DNA is structured in such a way that it can be replicated every time a cell divides in two. Both of the two daughter cells have to have identically the same genetic information after the division and copying processes. This replication is so precise that it can be compared to 280 clerks copying the entire Bible sequentially each one from the previous one with at most one single letter being transposed erroneously in the entire copying process.

When a DNA string is replicated, the double strand is unwound, and at the same time a complementary strand is constructed on each separate one, so that, eventually, there are two new double strands identical to the original one […] One cell division lasts from 20 to 80 minutes, and during this time the entire molecular library, equivalent to one thousand books, is copied correctly. [vi]

The Master Programmer endowed us with perfect code and only at the fall of man did it become corrupted. This chemical code, built on the A, G, T and C, becomes corrupted as a result of a shuffling of the order of those bits or a loss of one or more bits. Loss of data occurs through replication and through the decomposition of the medium (cf. CD ROM). Adam, as the father of the race and a direct creation of God, had a perfect code. There was no loss of data or corruption of the data in any way. Once he and Eve sinned, death (errors in the genetic code) entered our first parents and those errors have not only been passed to all of their descendants, but the loss of data has been increasing over time as would be consistent with data loss in the world of computers. John Sanford notes that this degradation of data is cumulative and will one day result in the extinction of the human race in his book Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome: “The extinction of the human genome appears to be just as certain and deterministic as the extinction of stars, the death of organisms, and the heat death of the universe.” [vii]

Information is Non-material

We must keep in mind that DNA is simply the medium which stores information. Information, however, is something distinct from the medium (or storage device). In his book, In the Beginning Was Information, Dr. Gitt explains the difference between the two:

Information requires a material medium for storage. If one writes some information with chalk on a blackboard, the chalk is the material carrier. If it is wiped off, the total quantity of chalk is still there, but the information has vanished. In this case the chalk was a suitable material medium, but the essential aspect was the actual arrangement of the particles of the chalk. And this arrangement was definitely not random, it had a mental origin. The same information that was written on the blackboard could also have been written on a magnetic diskette. Certain tracks of the diskette then became magnetized, and also in this case there is a carrier for the information. [viii]

An average blank CD ROM costs just pennies; it is the information on that disc which can cost hundreds, thousands or even millions of dollars. However, regardless of how much data is written on the disc, the disc does not change at all in how much it weighs. Thus information is separate from the device holding it. The loss of data by erasing chalk from a chalkboard is analogous to the loss of data in our DNA. Of course, not all of the data in our DNA has been lost but a significant part of the message has been compromised and now the errors are being compounded with every successive generation. Humanity is suffering from an information loss in our own source code.

The most amazing thing about the seed (DNA) is the information that it contains, which was placed there by our Maker (the Master Programmer). What the modern science of Information Technology is just now discovering is that information does not just happen (which incidentally, is an incredible proof for God and against evolution). Dr. Gitt explains that information is a fundamental entity and is therefore, not a property of matter. He formulates several theorems in order to describe information. In theorem 1 he states: “The fundamental quantity information is a nonmaterial (mental) entity. It is not a property of matter, so that purely material processes are fundamentally precluded as sources of information,” (emphasis mine). [ix] In theorem 3 he notes that it is information which “comprises the nonmaterial foundation for all technological systems and for all works of art.” [x]

If the information that we originally received from God is being compromised such that one day the entire human race will suffer the ultimate data corruption known as extinction then we clearly need the Master Programmer to fix the source code. Fortunately, our Maker has provided a way for our code to be corrected. However, it required that the Maker Himself take on our code, mix it with His own and then offer His blood. Through rebirth we are guaranteed a new body (eternal life) and we have been given the Holy Spirit as the down payment. Thus in the world to come our DNA (our code) will be restored and upgraded.

Normal Conception

Before we try to understand the genetics of the incarnation we need to have a grasp of what happens at the point of a normal conception. During the process of procreation approximately 250 million sperm swim toward the ovum. Both the ovum and the sperm are essentially very similar information. The sperm have a flagellum which propels them on their quest but the genetic information that they carry inside is what is truly significant.

Our body’s cells have forty-six individual chromosomes or twenty-three pairs (diploid). However, the egg and sperm cells have only twenty-three individual chromosomes such that when they combine (during fertilization) they will equal the forty-six individual (twenty-three diploid) chromosomes necessary for human life. The process by which the somatic (body) cells (forty-six chromosomes) are divided is called meiosis. The cells created, which are just the twenty-three individual chromosomes, are called haploid cells. During reproduction, the maternal and paternal gametes (haploid cells), “fuse at conception to produce a zygote, which will turn into a fetus and eventually into an adult human being” according Silke Schmidt writing in the Genetics Encyclopedia. [xi] The Encyclopedia Britannica summarizes the process: “When two gametes unite during fertilization, each contributes its haploid set of chromosomes to the new individual, restoring the diploid number.” [xii]

The Incarnation

As we stated before, we need to emphasize that Jesus did not begin to exist at the incarnation – He is eternal and has always existed. Yet, the incarnation was the point at which the Godhead mingled seed (DNA i.e. information) with humanity. Let’s consider the mechanics of the incarnation from what we have studied so far. Keep in mind that the following summary does not pretend to account for the entire mystery of what it is for God to take on flesh, nevertheless, we seek to embrace all of the information that God has revealed through His Word. Nor does this explanation account for all the potential reasons the incarnation was necessary. However, looking at the incarnation from a genetics perspective does demonstrate how Jesus could become one of us and yet remain free from sin.

Peter Underhill, in Encyclopedia.com writes concerning the uniqueness of the Y chromosome and how it is passed from generation to generation unchanged:

Since normally only one Y chromosome exists per cell, no pairing between X and Y occurs at meiosis, except at small regions. Normally, no crossing over occurs. Therefore, except for rare mutations that may occur during spermatogenesis, a son will inherit an identical copy of his father’s Y chromosome, and this copy is also essentially identical to the Y chromosomes carried by all his paternal forefathers, across the generations. This is in contrast to the rest of his chromosomal heritage, which will be a unique mosaic of contributions from multiple ancestors created by the reshuffling process of recombination, (emphasis mine). [xiii]

This means that of the twenty-three individual chromosomes (haploid) in the gamete, only one (1/23) could potentially be a Y chromosome. Thus the other twenty-two chromosomes provided by the father’s sperm will all be autosomes or non-sex chromosomes. If the twenty-third chromosome is an X, then the resulting person will be a girl. However, if the sperm is carrying that one Y chromosome then the baby will be a boy. Nevertheless, Peter Underhill has stated that there is essentially no change of the Y chromosome from father to son from generation to generation. The X’s in contrast will be a mosaic of his multiple ancestors. Learner.org’s online textbook states the peculiarity in another way: “The lack of recombination means that the entire non-recombining portion of the Y is passed intact from father to son. A male shares the same Y chromosome with his father, paternal grandfather, paternal great-grandfather, and so on,” (emphasis mine). [xiv] Neil Bradman and Mark Thomas state the significance of implications of this reality perhaps as clearly as possible in light of our study in their article Why Y? The Y Chromosome In The Study Of Human Evolution, Migration And Prehistory.

Genesis, chapter 5, records “the generations of Adam”: Adam begat Seth, Seth begat Enosh, Enosh begat Kenan… down to Noah of the flood. Translated into modern genetic terms, the account could read “Adam passed a copy of his Y chromosome to Seth, Seth passed a copy of his Y chromosome to Enosh, Enosh passed a copy of his Y chromosome to Kenan“… and so on until Noah was born carrying a copy of Adam’s Y chromosome. The Y chromosome is paternally inherited; human males have one while females have none. What is more, the Y chromosome a father passes to his son is, in large measure, an unchanged copy of his own, (emphasis mine). [xv]

This means that whatever information was encoded in Adam’s Y chromosome was passed on unchanged (virtually) to all of his descendants including all of us men alive today! However, if the information in the Y chromosome were faulty, then it would mean that all of his descendants (including us) would also have a faulty code. Discovering the exact make-up of the Y chromosome when Adam was first created is impossible for us to do, however, its current state may tell us something about the fall. The Y chromosome may in fact be a record of an event in the life of our original father. Bradman and Thomas suggest that the Y chromosome contains “a record of an event” [xvi] in the life the man who passed on the current Y chromosome. However, because Bradman and Thomas are committed to the evolutionary paradigm they believe the event “had no effect on the life of the man in whom the change occurred nor, indeed, on the life of his descendants,” (emphasis mine). [xvii] Is it possible that the recorded event is not something that had “little or no effect,” but is in some way the record of the genetic fall of our first father? Thus Adam not only died spiritually by virtue of losing the Holy Spirit, but his genetic information (as recorded specifically in the Y chromosome) was corrupted. God stated that in the day that Adam ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he would die (Genesis 2:17).

Death, it appears, entered into Adam’s Y chromosome (in some way unique and different than the X) that very moment causing him to go from being genetically perfect to having serious errors in his code that would eventually cause a “crash”. Occasionally people who use computers will experience a scenario where the operating system experiences a “fatal crash”. The crash occurs because there is some conflict in the code of the program. Though the program may be able to sustain data loss for a short period, if uncorrected, the program will eventually crash. In Adam’s case, that crash took 930 years, but he did eventually experience a complete shutdown.

If that is correct, then the Y chromosome (and all of his chromosomes) must have been complete and whole before Adam fell into sin. We know that he was free from all imperfections because God created him and declared him to be good and because death entered into the world via Adam’s sin. Yet, the Y chromosome seems to contain something so deleterious that our savior could not have shared it. After all, every copy of the Y chromosome (that is, every male descendant of Adam) would necessarily have the same genetic flaw that would also lead to the ultimate crash. In order to save mankind on a genetic level, a new Y chromosome would need to be provided. Furthermore, through the disobedience of Adam all of creation was made subject to corruption as Paul states in Romans 8.

For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now. Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body, (Romans 8:19-23).

In some way, Adam’s disobedience and subsequent corruption spread to all creation. It could be, though we cannot be sure, that Eve was included under the “creation”. In any event women are seemingly not excepted due to the fact that every daughter received twenty-three haploid chromosomes from her biological father who has a Y chromosome and therefore a man, carrying Adam’s faulty Y chromosome, was directly involved in her procreation.

The Original Data Loss A.K.A. “Original Sin”

Scripture testifies to the “blue screen of death” which we could argue has been historically known as original sin. Paul discusses at length that all face the effects of sin (corruption) even though one man was responsible for bringing it into the world. “For since through man is the death, also through man is a rising again of the dead, (1 Corinthians 15:21 Revised Young’s Literal Translation RYLT). [xviii] Paul then reiterates and summarizes by saying: “for even as in Adam all die, so also in the Christ all shall be made alive, and each in his proper order, a first-fruit Christ, afterwards those who are the Christ’s, in his presence,” (1 Corinthians 15:22-23 RYLT). Jesus not only rose from the dead, but also mixed with mankind. Thus our resurrection seems to also entail being mixed with the Lord. Bible commentator Thomas Constable notes that the death and resurrection are not just some kind of “spiritual” entities but are in fact physical and literal.

Adam derived life from another, God; but Christ is Himself the fountain of life. Adam was the first man in the old creation, and, like him, all of his sons die physically. Christ is the first man in the new creation, and, like Him, all of His sons will live physically (cf. Rom. 5:12-19). […] Both Adam and Jesus were men. Therefore our resurrection will be a human resurrection, not some “spiritual” type of resurrection. Physical resurrection is as inevitable for the son of Jesus Christ as physical death is for the son of Adam, (Constable Notes).

Paul has a longer discussion of how sin came into the world through one man (Adam) and how death, therefore, was passed or spread to all men.

Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned – for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come. But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ. Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous, (Romans 5:12-19).

Though the sin of Adam was indeed moral in that he broke the command of God, the result was physical as well as spiritual. We have already discussed how his sinning resulted in immediate spiritual death – the loss of the Holy Spirit. However, it also appears from the two above passages that the concept of original sin – that is how we are born in sin – is due to the fact that every child of Adam is also a genetic copy of Adam and Eve (of course with genetic recombination). We might think of it like sour dough bread in which each time a new loaf of bread is made, a little bit of the starter dough is taken and thrown into the mix. In that way, the starter dough is in every new batch.

So it is with Adam’s genes: we are all copies of him and therefore whatever coding errors he had would be passed on to us from the very point of conception. The fact that sin is attributed to Adam and not to Eve, though she was the first to break God’s command seems readily explainable. When God formed Eve He took from his side which of course contains bone marrow. In bone marrow are the stem cells from which all other cells in the body can be replicated. Therefore, God merely borrowed some code from Adam (removed the Y chromosome and added a second X chromosome) and voila – a female clone of Adam. Upon seeing her, Adam even declared: “This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man,” (Genesis 2:23). Therefore we draw the conclusion that it was the master disc (Adam) that counts when making copies; Eve received her code from Adam. This understanding would certainly not detract from Adam acting as our federal head, but would serve to clarify how exactly that sin was passed and why we are “in sin” from conception.

The solution to the problem is analogous to the problem itself – also an idea that we have already examined in part; John states that “No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him, and he cannot keep on sinning because he has been born of God,” (1 John 3:9). The new birth will not merely be a clearing of our debts (though thank the Lord it includes that!) but we will truly be reborn with new bodies. We get to take possession of our new bodies (with their correct DNA, i.e. information) in heaven. Until that time we have the Holy Spirit as a down payment (guarantee).

Conclusions of the Incarnation

As our understanding of genetics and specifically the Y chromosome stands right now, we are able to conclude that if Adam was corrupted genetically then his descendants would be too and something particular to the data errors in the Y chromosome was especially significant. That means that the data loss was extremely significant and as such crashes in the system will result in time. Since the Y chromosome is passed from father to son (identically), every son will experience the same data loss. Though women do not carry the Y chromosome, they are still under the curse (data loss) because every daughter has a father who is a son of Adam. Therefore, whether son or daughter, all have shared in the genetic loss that Adam first experienced. However in the conception of Jesus’ incarnation, the Y chromosome from Adam was not passed on. Therefore Jesus must have (in the flesh) had a perfect Y chromosome! Though while connected genetically to humanity by way of the X chromosomes, Jesus was not a carrier of the Y chromosome which Adam had passed to all subsequent generations. Jesus became the first fruits of the resurrection because one day, by way of the “seed of God” that we have received as believers, we will mingle with our creator.

We can thus summarize the genetic events of the incarnation as such: Jesus, who, as eternal God, is spirit (John 4:24). As the “source code” [xix] of all living things, He is also the prime “data/information” which is/was non-material. His “information” was put into a medium. In order to encode the information in the physical medium (DNA) the Holy Spirit did apparently one of two options. He either: 1) made ex nihilo the DNA material (amino acids etc.) or 2) used the existing material in the egg, as the medium into which Jesus’ non-material spirit went into. The Holy Spirit then fused “the Jesus” gamete (spermatocyte) with Mary’s gamete (oocyte) (recall that a gamete contains DNA, which is stored information, which is a non-material entity). The fusion of the two gametes is when the incarnation (becoming flesh cf. John 1:14) occurred. The chromosomes from Mary and the Holy Spirit fused to make the (body of the) new Adam. Because Jesus is the second Adam, and because we are genetically connected with the first Adam, we must also be mingled with Jesus’ DNA (“He shall see His seed,” Isaiah 53:10, see also 1 John 3:9, 1 Peter 1:23).

About Douglas

45 comments

  1. If anyone is interested in more information on this topic from a slightly different angle, Arthur Custance wrote a good book titled “The Seed of the Woman”. It is a long read, but well worth the time (like all of his books). He points out the “information preserving” process that takes place in the reproduction of females. When a woman’s egg is fertilized by an “x” sperm (female), part of the genetic material in the egg remains within a protective membrane and does not mix with the genetic contribution coming from the sperm. This genetic material is used to create the eggs that the female offspring will be born with. The remainder of the ovum’s dna does get mixed with the father’s corrupted dna, and this mix is what forms all of the female offspring’s body EXCEPT the offspring’s ovum. In a crude analogy that today would be considered very sexist and misogynistic, Mr. Custance uses chickens for a comparison and points out that the way this process is set up, it seems that the egg is not the means for continuing the line of future hens, the baby hen is produced for the purpose of passing on the information in the egg. That there is something extraordinary about the female’s role in reproduction is hinted at in the creation account in Genesis. Adam is made when God takes a lump of clay and just “squeezes him out” (yats-ahr in Hebrew). Relatively simple and straightforward. In contrast, Eve is “built”, signified by the word ‘beyn’ in Hebrew. This implies a more complicated process and also hints at the need for “understanding” since beyn sounds a lot like “binah” a word meaning understanding. In Job 14:4 Job asks a question that many view as a reference to a perceived problem in our redemption – “Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one!”. Since Adam and Eve both fell, how can the seed of a fallen woman conquer the serpent and redeem us? The answer is that God made preparations beforehand and made sure that the human contribution for bringing forth that Seed was protected from the results of the fall He knew would take place. I would encourage anyone to check out Mr. Custance’s various books and “Doorway Papers” at http://www.custance.org . He brings out a lot of details from science, history and anthropology that are very interesting and shed light on a lot of puzzling things found in the scriptures. Like why Noah cursed Canaan and not Ham, etc. I spent most of one snowy winter in Montana reading everything on his site.

    • I forgot to mention, the process Mr. Custance describes eliminates the need for Jesus’ mother Mary to be sinless. Jesus was not corrupted by descent from Adam, His human part was protected from the results of the fall and passed down intact from Eve to Mary. Jesus was in close contact with sinners all His life and they could not defile Him, He cleansed them.

    • Interesting. Thanks for sharing.

  2. Jesus Christ did indeed have a beginning and what made him the Son of God was a birth into our world, after God, who is a Holy Spirit(making that same One Spirit “the Father”). He is, after all, the only begotten Son of God. One writer says, He was full of the Holy Ghost (Lk 4:1) while another writer says of that same Spirit that dwelled in Jesus, over and over again, that it was Jesus expressly saying that it was the Father that dwelleth in me. Your Trinitarian philosophy is helping those who follow your false teaching to stay lost. I know you are too self righteous to take advice from a man who has received a revelation from the Lord, but, I suggest you purchase a book called, “The Divided God”. It was written by an ex-Baptist Minister, who was allowed to see what you won’t accept. God is not a Trinity. God is not Triune. There is no reason or purpose for a triunity in Deity, for God is All-Powerful in every way. That means a whole lot more than any triunity could possibly do. Ity would actually be lessening Deity to your false ideas. But, you most likely will not take my advice, deciding to go ahead and try to deride my belief that all one will ever see, if you make it to heaven, is the invisible God who manifests himself in the Temple which he created through a virgin. Namely, all we’ll see of God, who is invisible, is the Person of Jesus Christ, sitting on the Throne.

  3. I’m a little confused. So if Mary’s ovum was used, then her ovum was genetically perfect without having any trace of sin or the fall? If not, how can Jesus be perfect in every way—the spotless Lamb fit for Calvary?

  4. If
    adam passed sin nature to humanity, through the sin-corrupted
    Y-chromosome, why do women have a sin nature, too. How did Jesus be born
    without sin nature but women always have?

  5. Thank you so much for this very detailed explanation. I realize it’s not infallible but it is a very good explanation on a biological level of what happened in the incarnation. I have wanted to have a better understanding of this for a very long time. Excellent piece of writing.

  6. Very interesting! So this leads me to a question: Isn’t this WHY Jesus emphatically stated that one must be “born again” of the Holy Spirit, whereby God’s holy seed actually takes up residence in your body and transforms/changes your faulty genetics you inherited biologically from your earthly parents? Unless one is “born again” of this holy, perfect unblemished spiritual seed, Christ said, one cannot “see” the kingdom nor even “enter” the kingdom of God. I do think a genetic, spiritual, yet also physical transformation of some kind, an exchange of the death genes into “life” genes so to speak, starts to take place when one *first* becomes born again of the Holy Spirit. And the transformation process of making a born again person perfect again,(as Adam was before he sinned) without sin, or degredation, I think happens, when a person becomes supernaturally and spiritually born again of God’s Holy seed. Jesus Christ was born without sin. We however, are born “in sin”. So for us, it is a process of being changed the new man and “pefected” by that Holy seed which has been implanted by the Holy Spirit in us, which had first taken up residence within us when we became born again.The process of perfection, ie; becoming like Christ, can take place within one’s body as we “yeild ourselves to the Spirit”. Christ is being “formed” in us, as Paul stated. Seeds grow.The problem we have today in MOST of Christendom, is that people who claim to CHRISTians, ie: duplicates of Christ,are not truely “born again” of God’s Holy Spirit! They have only made the mental assent of believing, but have never had the true implantation of God’s spiritual and holy “seed” within one’s being.Unless the seed of God’s very real spiritual implantation has taken place within the soil of a person’s heart, they CANNOT “see” nor can they “enter” into God’s kingdom! Jesus said that. Because, you HAVE to have His spiritual SEED inside of you, to enter into God’s kingdom.Unless you actually have that, you ain’t getting in, bottom line! Food for thought. One MUST be “born again” to get in.Otherwise, by default, you will stay in Satan’s “kingdom” and perish (die eternally) because you didn’t have the right genetics so to speak.

    • good evening heidi,

      i believe the scripture stated: “”He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.” 1 peter 2:22

      there is no scripture that states that jesus was born without sin. as there is no scripture that teaches that everyone after adam was born with sin. in fact jesus said heaven belongs to children. and heaven cannot accommodate sin nor sinners.

      jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” matthew 19:14

      it is clear in scripture that the one who sins is the one who dies. death here is spiritual death. physical death was a given for all humans including adam. the death that he would experience when he disobeyed was a separation from his fellowship with god, that is, spiritual death like jesus suffered on the cross. god declared, “…for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” genesis 2:17b adam did not physically die that day.

      adam and eve were provided the tree of life in the garden to live forever and then after their disobedience were barred from partaking of it for god said, ““…The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” genesis 3:22b

      paul explains sin acting in the world like yeast in a whole lump of dough. it is corrupting. so, the problem is every one becomes corrupted, including mary, not that everyone is corrupted at birth.

      “FOR all HAVE sinned (and not all are born in sin) and fall short of the glory of god.” romans 3:23

      the doctrine of original sin does not consider for one reason or another the above account of the fall of adam and even and of paul’s writings.

      in this same vein, i would not see the sense of the biogenetics issue of sin and how jesus was supposedly freed from sin that was not there in the first place proposed here either. jesus had to be born of a virgin to show his divine origin and the divine workings of his birth as the prophesied promise by god.

      “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6

      “14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” Isaiah 7:14

      his virgin birth is also the marker of who the promised savior is among those prophecies that would unquestionably identify who this anointed one of god is.

      sin is spiritual, not physical. it is like a corrupted software, not a defective hardware.

      our bodies were not made to last as genesis 3:22b clearly reveals. twice the immortal angels rebelled (first satan indicated in genesis 3, then those mentioned in genesis 6). god wanted a new creation that will become molded first in his image and character before he makes them immortal. so our life on earth is but a boot camp for us to develop his character outlined in the ten commandments summarized by jesus as god’s definition of loving him and loving our fellow human beings.

      be blessed heidi,
      grace

  7. Your study as related in “Part Four: Genetics of the Incarnation”, is seems supported with sufficient scriptural reference but draws on human rationale. John 3:16 “….that he gave his only begotten Son…” says it all. The Greek word for “begotten” is monogeneses which, in English, becomes monogenetic. The only gene he had was prepared by God exclusively to be free of human contamination thus constituting his qualification to be pure and thus perfect as a sacrifice back to God without having come through any ancestral derivation. Only He and Adam were thus created. Adam sinned, Jesus didn’t and obeyed God which made his sacrifice acceptable to God. Reference to his “seed” is symbolic in that, as flesh, he came from a royal line qualifying him as an earthly king. Being pure spiritually through his obedience to God and without personal or ancestral sin qualified him as King of Kings.

    • Great thinking but I think you have a few holes you need to consider. I don’t mean to pick fights with my fellow believers and this ones hard to get across but it is now understood that Monogenese means “unique son.” And your argument seems contingent on the fact monogenese means begotten son. Adam in Luke 1 is called God’s Son, the Son’s of God are obviously called God’s sons, we are adopted sons of God, ect. Also, I half to disagree that his genes were not “contaminated” by humanity. You may not realize it but that is a very Gnostic approach. Gnosticism contends that flesh is evil. (Hebrews 2:18 states he struggled himself) Further, I get what your saying, but realize you stated it a bit poorly. Jesus was preexistence, so he by definition was not created. As far as ancestral sin, look up Deut. 24:16 and Ezekiel 18:20. It’s Great your thinking deep, just want to steer you away from some pitfalls.

  8. Great article! I have a lot of questions but I’ll have to think about them and get back with you. I have always wondered if perhaps sin was not passed through the woman but through the man because of Mary. Surely she was a sinner but did not pass that sin onto Jesus. Do you think the inherited sin could possibly in that Y chromosome?

  9. Hello! The article is not showing up here.  I see it happened before.  Please put it up again. I’d love to read it. 🙂

  10. That was strange. All better now. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

    Doug

  11. I’m confused. So the Y chromosone has been “corrupted” somehow and that explains my fallen nature as a man because I have inherited a Y chromosome from Adam. But then you say that women are corrupted just because of vague inheritance. Which is it? Is it genetic or not?

    There are actually numerous problems with this genetics idea but I’m not sure where to start.

    Why don’t you approach some geneticists to see where on the Y chromosome the “corruption” is? You could start by narrowing your search to fixed, invariant sites on the Y chromosome since every man is corrupted (I would suspect you would end up with protein coding sequences but I doubt they would be invariant). You could then further exclude sites that are present in other mammals. I mean, mechanistically, how do you think this corruption stuff might work? 

    • Eve and all of creation are also corrupted because she and all creation was made subject to futility per Romans 8:19-22. Thanks for your comments. I hope that a geneticist can pick up the work since I don’t have the tools to do so. Blessings

  12. I believe you have misunderstood entropy. First off, I see an equivocation between “disorder” as used in thermodynamics, and “disorder” as used in everyday language. It is helpful to think of entropy in terms of microstates (used in statistical mechanical descriptions of entropy). microstates are basically the different ways energy can be distributed in a system. Descriptions of entropy are dependent on they way we describe a system, particularly on a macroscopic scale.

    As an example lets say we imagine a system as 10 coins. Each coin can be in one of two “energy” states, heads or tails. Therefore, there are a total 2^10 (1000+) different possible states in the system. We are considering this as an isolated system (where the “law” of entropy actually applies), that means that no energy or matter (coins in this case) enter or leave the system. In this isolated system energy is freely transferred from one coin to another causing them to change states (flip sides).  Every possible microstate is equally likely but not every macrostate (because of how we define it).

    Lets start with every coin as heads, 1 state out of 2^10. Here the microstate is equivalent to the macrostate because there is only 1 state where all coins can be heads.

    now the macrostate becomes 2 tails and 8 heads. How many microstates are equivalent?
    There are actually 45 different microstates that have 2 tails and 8 heads. (go ahead check this yourself, I would also recommend reading up on binomial coefficients). For the macrostate of 5 tails and 5 heads, there are 252 equivalent microstates.

    Now, keeping in mind that each microstate is equally likely, we see that most of the microstates have 5 tails and 5 heads. If we start the system at all heads we will see it gradually transition, simply due to the statistics, from all heads to 5 tails/5 heads where it will tend to stay (because more microstates are 5 heads/5 tails, there is a higher probability for the system to be 5 heads/5 tails than say all heads which is only 1 microstate).

    The system will increase its entropy (its distribution of energies) until it has reached an equilibrium point. in other words, energy will move through the system and will settle at 5 heads/5 tails because there are more microstates for that macrostate. At 5 heads/5 tails, energy can be distributed in more ways (highest entropy) because there are more microstates.

    “Disorder” in the sense that we use it in daily language is NOT entropy.
    Furthermore, the 2nd law only applies in isolated systems. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but we have an enormous fireball in the sky pumping energy onto the earth. For simplicity’s sake, if you think entropy entails constant movement towards disorder how is it that you can make ice? synthesize a plastic polymer from a bunch small molecules in solution? or grow up from a single cell?    

    • Thanks again for your detailed comments. I will keep that in mind. The basic thing that I am talking about is how things are falling apart. Whether you want to call that entropy, 2nd Law of Thermo… is perhaps a matter of semantics. However, things are falling apart. A heat death of the universe and everything is tending toward disorder. The Bible confirms that and even predicted it. Take care.

  13. Acts 17:30 “And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:”

    Somehow, I think this fits in this discussion. I admit that I cannot, absolutely determine whether or not Mary’s actual DNA was or was not part of the Christ’s human body.

    Mr. Hamp thoroughly describes the process of making a human exactly. I agree that whatever the case with Mary’s DNA, the Holy Spirit needed no sperm. However, as Mr. Hamp points out, the Y chromosome is certainly corrupt form the fall. He adds that Mary’s DNA had seen corruption, too. I believe that no one can argue that any DNA from any member of the human race is completely without corruption from sin.

    The curse, in general (entropy), and the passing of corrupt, damaged DNA is a continuous process from Adam and Eve to the present. The sacrificial lambs in Israel had to be spotless, insofar as the priest could determine. He could not know about corrupt DNA caused by entropy. Thus God “winked” at this innocent ignorance.

    The Lamb of God, however, WAS/IS spotless. I believe in all ways, the second Adam, as originally created in the first Adam. No corrupt DNA is present or anything else corrupt, for that matter. The issue of time and the “decendency” of the Messiah from David and Abraham is really a mute point. He was the “Lamb that was slain before the foundation of the world.” How do we understand that? Placing the UNcorrupted DNA of Adam, Abraham and David as a “zygote” seems to be quite plausible. I would argue, necessary.

    Just a thought for now. We’ll know soon enough.

    • Thanks for your thoughts. The breakthrough for me came when I zoomed in on the fact that Scripture talks about God’s seed (Isaiah 53:10, 1 John 3:9, I Peter 1:23). What I also found astounding as I kept researching was that information, which is stored in the DNA is a non-material entity – I have to wonder if that could be the “storage” place of the soul – just a thought.

  14. Wow, very nice study! God is certainly in the details!!!

  15. Isn’t it wonderful, though, that the Holy Spirit will often show is the “why” and the “how” later on to enhance our understanding of Jesus? I was awestruck by this information, and it added to the gems I have in the Lord’s treasury gift to me. How wonderful it is that the Lord is even in the minutest of details! It just shows His intelligence and purposeful intent in saving us from this corrupted world. Thank You Father, in Jesus’ Name, for your Holy Spirit and for what You have done for us in order to keep us to Yourself! Amen, Halleluja, Maranath, and Amen again!

  16. I’m wondering what part of the “Son of God” don’t you folks understand? Jesus is the second member of the Trinity. We are of Adam who was a creation. Jesus is the Son of the Most High…..period. God in the flesh. “Seed” is a term of direct decendency. Forget this test tube stuff.
    The Trinity of God is a mystery that we as humans will not understand in this life. Perhaps it will be a little bit more unsderstandable when we’ve been glorified.

    Why is it that we have to dissect and analyze everthing?
    God wants us back from the dead. He was willing to take on flesh, come here and die a horrible death to redeem us. This is a wonderful gift!.Let’s accept the gift, share the good news with those who want to hear it and leave the analyzing for the unregerate unbelievers.

    • Billy God bless you man. Surely you can understand He was also the “Son of Mary” as well though? Remember He was both fully man and fully God. i don’t believe Pastor Hamp has asserted anywhere that Jesus was a “test tube” baby. We dissect and analyze things because we believe the word of God and we wan’t to know our maker better as well as have a good grasp of our history, our future, as well as what is expected of us.

  17. I’m wondering what part of the “Son of God” don’t you folks understand? Jesus is the second member of the Trinity. We are of Adam who was a creation. Jesus is the Son of the Most High…..period. God in the flesh. “Seed” is a term of direct decendency. Forget this test tube stuff.
    The Trinity of God is a mystery that we as humans will not understand in this life. Perhaps it will be a little bit more unsderstandable when we’ve been glorified.

    Why is it that we have to dissect and analyze everthing?
    God wants us back from the dead. He was willing to take on flesh, come here and die a horrible death to redeem us. This is a wonderful gift!.Let’s accept the gift, share the good news with those who want to hear it and leave the analyzing for the unregerate unbelievers.

  18. I’m wondering what part of the “Son of God” don’t you folks understand? Jesus is the second member of the Trinity. We are of Adam who was a creation. Jesus is the Son of the Most High…..period. God in the flesh. “Seed” is a term of direct decendency. Forget this test tube stuff.
    The Trinity of God is a mystery that we as humans will not understand in this life. Perhaps it will be a little bit more unsderstandable when we’ve been glorified.

    Why is it that we have to dissect and analyze everthing?
    God wants us back from the dead. He was willing to take on flesh, come here and die a horrible death to redeem us. This is a wonderful gift!.Let’s accept the gift, share the good news with those who want to hear it and leave the analyzing for the unregerate unbelievers.

  19. wow. i love having the Holy Spirit as the earnest of that body– a part of the first fruits of the dead. i’ll be glad when the old man is dead altogether and my life — that is in the blood, after all, will be fully sybling to the Son of Man, the Christ, Jesus — the One who calls to His sister in Song of Solomon.

    it’s all just too, too much.

    extraordinary study. thank you. years ago, i made the statement, only to my own ears, that something physical must go on at the rebirth — i don’t remember what thoughts had brought me to that conclusion, but ever after, i was sure of it, though i knew not what. indeed, i had no idea. and still, even with your incredible insight into this marvelous mystery, we probably still cannot imagine the full extent. but even this much has utterly amazed me.

  20. the first pollution was the serpants seeds mingling with Eve with the resulting birth of Cain-like Christ said about the kinnites you are of your father’s seed. Able was conceived from Adam’s seed and Eve’s seed. From Adam’s seed many generations later came Christ through the seed of Mary. Adam and Eve did not cover their mouths with shame they covered their private parts they took part in a sexual act with the serpant rather than as we are told “ate an apple”.

  21. the first pollution was the serpants seeds mingling with Eve with the resulting birth of Cain-like Christ said about the kinnites you are of your father’s seed. Able was conceived from Adam’s seed and Eve’s seed. From Adam’s seed many generations later came Christ through the seed of Mary. Adam and Eve did not cover their mouths with shame they covered their private parts they took part in a sexual act with the serpant rather than as we are told “ate an apple”.

    • I’m not trying to pick a fight, I just want to show you the kind of logic your dealing with. The Serpent Seed Doctrine has been rejected by both Jewish and Christian Orthodoxy. It has no room to stand textually. Show me concrete in the text where Abel is the son of the serpent please. Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.” (Gen 4:1) (knew his wife is a clear Biblical euphemism foor sexual intercourse in scripture) Why did Cain not tell God “Am I my half-brother’s Keeper?” Show me where Adam and Eve only covered their private parts. Show me where they ate an apple. Your relying to heavily upon artistic rendition. With the line of logic the Serpent Seed Doctrine gives, we could conclude that Peter the disciple was the Serpent in the garden. The Serpent is shown to be Satan in Revelation, and Jesus told Peter in Matthew 16:23 “Get behind me Satan.” And if you don’t believe Peter is Satan then your calling Jesus a liar; and your theology will fall apart. Its called bad hermeneutics.

  22. You state that Jesus is the second “person” of the Godhead. Who is the first “person” God is a Spirit, John 4:24 and the Holy Spirit is a Spirit. God is the light being Heb 1:3. Perhaps you do not mean “person” as in having flesh, blood, spirit and soul.

    • God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are three separate Persons, as well as being One together. Whether physical or spirit, They are still Persons, just as we are still persons after this body dies.

    • It’s a confusing subject no doubt about it. To condense a mellennia of debate and understanding into a few short and sweet sentences: The First “person” would be the Father. Jesus has been rendered as the “Second Person” because He is begotten of the Father before creation (see Proverbs 8:22) The Holy Spirit would be the “Third Person” because he is issued from Jesus. (Romans 8:9) “Persons” meaning each have their own unique will as well as personality, although all three wills are always in agreement. The proper term is Hypostatic Union. Hypostasis meaning, a shared essence between two separate distinct persons.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: