Home » Calvinism Answered » Part Seven: The Sons of Seth and Daughters of Cain Theory Refuted
Part Seven: The Sons of Seth and Daughters of Cain Theory Refuted

Part Seven: The Sons of Seth and Daughters of Cain Theory Refuted

The Bible is replete with evidence that the sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4 are fallen angels (demons). All of the ancient Jewish and Ante-Nicene Christian commentators believed the “sons of God” to be referring to demons (fallen angels).


Augustine of Hippo

The first, as far as we can see, to definitively deny the sons of God as being angels was Augustine of Hippo of the fifth century, approximately seventy five years after the drafting of the Nicene Creed. Augustine did much to spiritualize the history of the Bible and twist a simple straightforward reading of the Bible. His method of Bible interpretation made a profound impact and his legacy remains even to this day. Many centuries after Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, a doctor of the Catholic Church in the 13th century, quotes in his magnum opus, Summa Theologica, from Augustine’s work City of God (De Civ. Dei xv) concerning the sons of Seth:

Many persons affirm that they have had the experience, or have heard from such as have experienced it, that the Satyrs and Fauns, whom the common folk call incubi, have often presented themselves before women, and have sought and procured intercourse with them. Hence it is folly to deny it. But God’s holy angels could not fall in such fashion before the deluge. Hence by the sons of God are to be understood the sons of Seth, who were good; while by the daughters of men the Scripture designates those who sprang from the race of Cain. [i] Nor is it to be wondered at that giants should be born of them; for they were not all giants, albeit there were many more before than after the deluge. Still if some are occasionally begotten from demons, it is not from the seed of such demons, nor from their assumed bodies, but from the seed of men taken for the purpose; as when the demon assumes first the form of a woman, and afterwards of a man; just as they take the seed of other things for other generating purposes, as Augustine says (De Trin. iii), so that the person born is not the child of a demon, but of a man, [ii] (emphasis mine).

Just as Augustine fallaciously suggested the sons of God were the so called “godly line of Seth,” the daughters of men have been labeled as being from the “ungodly line of Cain”. Augustine says, “By the daughters of men the Scripture designates those who sprang from the race of Cain,” (Augustine as quoted in Summa Theologica, Aquinas). We must ask the important question – where in Scripture does it say such a thing? Augustine makes the claim above that Scripture designates those daughters as coming from the race of Cain, but just where do we see that? The answer is that we simply do not. It was first tentatively considered by Julius Africanus and then completely invented by Augustine and then repeated by all who would follow in his footsteps ever since. If the term “sons of God” refers to the “sons of Seth” as so many suggest, then why does the text not simply state it? Unfortunately neither Augustine nor Aquinas substantiates the claim. They simply presume their statement to be true and offer no biblical proof. Augustine states that “Scripture designates” that the daughters of men “sprang from the race of Cain”. But where in Scripture does it say that? Sadly, their unbiblical assertion has left its mark in the modern day creating a great deal of confusion regarding what the Bible literally teaches.

Calvin’s Interpretation

John Calvin in the 17th century carried on the tradition started by Augustine that the sons of God are in fact the sons of Seth. He states in his commentary:

The principle is to be kept in memory, that the world was then as if divided into two parts; because the family of Seth cherished the pure and lawful worship of God, from which the rest had fallen. Now, although all mankind had been formed for the worship of God, and therefore sincere religion ought everywhere to have reigned; yet since the greater part had prostituted itself, either to an entire contempt of God, or to depraved superstitions; it was fitting that the small portion which God had adopted, by special privilege, to himself, should remain separate from others. It was, therefore, base ingratitude in the posterity of Seth, to mingle themselves with the children of Cain, and with other profane races; because they voluntarily deprived themselves of the inestimable grace of God. For it was an intolerable profanation, to pervert, and to confound, the order appointed by God. It seems at first sight frivolous, that the sons of God should be so severely condemned, for having chosen for themselves beautiful wives from the daughters of men. But we must know first, that it is not a light crime to violate a distinction established by the Lord; secondly, that for the worshippers of God to be separated from profane nations, was a sacred appointment which ought reverently to have been observed, in order that a Church of God might exist upon earth; thirdly, that the disease was desperate, seeing that men rejected the remedy divinely prescribed for them. In short, Moses points it out as the most extreme disorder; when the sons of the pious, whom God had separated to himself from others, as a peculiar and hidden treasure, became degenerate, (emphasis mine). [iii]

Calvin rightly describes the world as being wicked, but he vainly asserts that the world had been “divided into two parts.” Where do we see such an idea in the Bible? He also introduces his deterministic philosophy of predestination by stating that apparently the sons of Seth were adopted by “special privilege.” His denial of who the sons of God truly were creates a tremendous amount of confusion that has clouded the interpretation of the text for potentially millions of people over the centuries. Furthermore, nowhere do we see that the daughters of men are from the so called ungodly line of Cain.

Calvin continues with his unbiblical prohibition of inter-class marriages. Notice that again he does not offer any biblical support for any of his positions. He does not seek to prove his point with Scripture but with opinion and conjecture. Having simply asserted his position, Calvin then ridicules the ‘sons of God as demons [m1] ‘ interpretation.

That ancient figment, concerning the intercourse of angels with women, is abundantly refuted by its own absurdity; and it is surprising that learned men should formerly have been fascinated by ravings so gross and prodigious. The opinion also of the Chaldean paraphrase is frigid; namely, that promiscuous marriages between the sons of nobles, and the daughters of plebeians, is condemned. Moses, then, does not distinguish the sons of God from the daughters of men, because they were of dissimilar nature, or of different origin; but because they were the sons of God by adoption, whom he had set apart for himself; while the rest remained in their original condition, (Calvin Commentary Genesis 6:1 emphasis mine).

We have already seen how “sons of God” is used in Scripture – furthermore that there were no human “sons of God” before the resurrection of Jesus. However Calvin introduces great confusion into the text by dogmatically declaring that God’s terms are very capricious and that they sometimes mean one thing in one context and quite another someplace else. The simple biblical definition, as we have seen, is that sons of God are direct creations of God. Calvin is unable to define sons of God because of bad exegesis.

Should anyone object, that they who had shamefully departed from the faith, and the obedience which God required, were unworthy to be accounted the sons of God; the answer is easy, that the honor is not ascribed to them, but to the grace of God, which had hitherto been conspicuous in their families. For when Scripture speaks of the sons of God, sometimes it has respect to eternal election, which extends only to the lawful heirs; sometimes to external vocations according to which many wolves are within the fold; and though in fact, they are strangers, yet they obtain the name of sons, until the Lord shall disown them. Yea, even by giving them a title so honorable, Moses reproves their ingratitude, because, leaving their heavenly Father, they prostituted themselves as deserters, (emphasis mine). [iv]

Now, to support his presuppositions, he must explain away the giants (Nephilim) that are introduced in Genesis 6:4 and are the result of the sons of God (or as he would say the sons of Seth) and the daughters of men (or as he would say the daughters of Cain).

Moses does not indeed say, that they were of extraordinary stature, but only that they were robust. Elsewhere, I acknowledge, the same word denotes vastness of stature, which was formidable to those who explored the land of Canaan, (Jos 13:33.) But Moses does not distinguish those of whom he speaks in this place, from other men, so much by the size of their bodies, as by their robberies and their lust of dominion, (emphasis mine). [v]

He downplays the fact that the fruit of the union between the sons of God and daughters of men were men of extraordinary size. He simply asserts that they were “great” in their evil. His interpretation is unfounded and he is not completely honest here for the word (Nephilim) used in both places is exactly the same. Calvin and numerous others turn to Genesis 4:26 in order to substantiate their case. Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary is very typical of those that leap to the conclusion that sons of God must be referring to the Sons of Seth.

Observe the different expressions: sons of God, and daughters of men. If you turn to Gen 4:26 you there discover that the children of Seth are said to call on the name of the Lord; including both sons and daughters; and hence, therefore, these are meant by the sons of God. [vi]

They suggest that this passage in some way proves that the term “sons of God” is really a hidden meaning for sons of Seth. Let’s take a look at the passage to see if their claims are valid.


Seth and His Sons

Seth appears a total of seven times in both the Old Testament and the New Testament (NKJV). We get a brief glimpse of his life by stringing together all of the passages [vii] that speak of him.

And Adam knew his wife again, and she bore a son and named him Seth […], and as for Seth, to him also a son was born; and he named him Enosh. Then men began to call on the name of the LORD, (Genesis 4:25-26).

And Adam lived one hundred and thirty years, and begot a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth. After he begot Seth, the days of Adam were eight hundred years; and he had sons and daughters. Seth lived one hundred and five years, and begot Enosh. After he begot Enosh, Seth lived eight hundred and seven years, and had sons and daughters. So all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years; and he died. (Genesis 5:3-4, 6-8).

Here 130 years after creation, Adam has a son named Seth; then 105 years after that Seth had a son named Enosh. Thus we learn that a total of 235 years after creation men began to call upon the name of the Lord. The Hebrew term for Lord is YHWH which is the personal name of God. God told Moses: “I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty [El Shaddai שַׁדָּ֑י אֵ֣ל], but by My name LORD [YHWH יְהוָה] I was not known to them,” (Exodus 6:3). Thus to think that this was the first time that humans began to worship the Lord is unfounded. Rather we simply read that they began to use his personal name at that point for some purpose. While it appears to have begun with a son of Seth, we should not infer that it was limited to that line. After all, the Hebrew text very literally says az hukhal likro beshem YHWH [בְּשֵׁ֥ם יְהוָֽה לִקְרֹ֖א הוּחַ֔ל אָ֣ז] “then was begun (the) calling by (with, in) the name YHWH” (translation mine). The term hukhal (הוּחַל) is the passive (hophal) of begin. The subject of the verb hukhal is “calling” (likro’ לִקְרֹא). The word “men” does not even appear in the text. Thus we see that apparently, up until that point, men were not invoking God by His proper name. It could be that they didn’t know it, though we cannot be sure. Nevertheless this reading of the verse does not in any way substantiate the notion that Seth’s sons were the sons of God. Another reading is possible which may clarify the passage.


A Possible Translation

Conversely, the verb hukhal (הוּחַל) comes from the root (חלל) the basic meaning is “to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin” according to Brown Driver Briggs’ [viii] Lexicon of the Hebrew Bible. Thus, the alternative reading would be “then calling by the name of YHWH was profaned”. This alternative reading actually finds endorsement by the ancient Aramaic Targumim. Targum Onkelos interprets the passage as:

And to Sheth also was born a son, and he called his name Enosh. Then in his days the sons of men desisted [חָלוּ] (or forbore) from praying in the name of the Lord, (Genesis 4:26, Targum Onkelos, emphasis mine).

Targum Jonathan is similar though it amplifies that reading even more:

And to Sheth also was born a son, and he called his name Enosh. That was the generation in whose days they began to err [למטעי], and to make themselves idols, and surnamed their idols by the name of the Word of the Lord, (Genesis 4:26, Targum Jonathan, emphasis mine).

While neither “began” nor “profane” supports the sons of Seth theory, the latter would seem to make more sense in light of the entire story of the Bible. The divine name seems to have been known from the very beginning of creation. Adam was familiar with it because he heard the voice of the LORD (YHWH) God in the garden after he had sinned. Calling by the name of the Lord was until that time respected and honored but it was in the days of Enosh when calling by the name of the Lord was defiled. God then destroyed the world because of the continual wickedness. Noah retains knowledge of the name and then apparently at the tower of Babel the name is forgotten or lost. God chooses not to reveal His name again until Moses has the encounter at the burning bush.


The Sons of Seth Were Not Sons of God

Regardless of which reading we take, there is simply no evidence whatsoever to support the concept that Genesis 4:26 can be used to interpret the sons of God as the sons of Seth. There is no indication that Seth’s sons were somehow more godly than the rest of humanity. Furthermore, it must not be missed that Adam lived another 800 years after begetting Seth and that he had sons and daughters. Likewise “Seth lived eight hundred and seven years and had sons and daughters,” (Genesis 5:7). All of the sons and daughters of Seth as well as the sons and daughters of Cain were in fact sons (and daughters) of Adam. Technically speaking every human ever born on this planet is a son or daughter of Adam; the Hebrew language uses the term to mean “human”. Thus the text is driving home the point that there are two dissimilar groups: the daughters of Adam on the one hand and the sons of God on the other. To suggest that the daughters of men were actually the daughters of Cain is fanciful. Rather, the daughters of Adam are contrasted with the sons of God: the daughters of men were human and the sons of God were not.

Furthermore, we can in no way infer that all of these sons and daughters remained so godly that they would be distinguished from the sons of Cain. After all, only eight people were saved out of the entire world. These sons of Seth must not have been so godly after all. Simply put, the sons of God do not refer to the lineage of Seth, but to direct creations of God, which before the redeeming work of Christ was limited to Adam himself and to angels. Therefore, the sons of God in Genesis six refers to fallen angels who had relations with human women.

Read More Articles Here.

[viii] Brown Driver Briggs (BDB) Hebrew English Lexicon provides the following definition. The most common definition is “1. to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin”. BDB then goes on to give the various forms of how the root is used in each of the binyanim (verbal paradigms). In the a. (Niphal) it means to: 1. to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself; b. ritually; c. sexually; 1. to be polluted, be defiled; d. (Piel): 1. to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 2. to violate the honour of, dishonour; 3. to violate (a covenant); 4. to treat as common; e. (Pual) to profane (name of God); f. (Hiphil): 1. to let be profaned; 2. to begin; g. (Hophal) to be begun (emphasis mine). The Hophal is simply the passive of the Hiphil – therefore, if the Hiphil occasionally means to let be profaned then the one occurrence of the Hophal might also be translated as profaned rather than begin.

About Douglas


  1. The second book of Adam and Eve is where Augustine may have took his interpretation from. Read chapter 20:24,31-32.

    2 Adam and Eve
    24 After this a hundred men of the children of Seth gathered together, and said among themselves, “Come, let us go down to the children of Cain, and see what they do, and enjoy ourselves with them.”

    31 And when they looked at the daughters of Cain, at their beautiful figures, and at their hands and feet dyed with colour, and tattooed in ornaments on their faces, the fire of sin was kindled in them.

    32 Then Satan made them look most beautiful before the sons of Seth, as he also made the sons of Seth appear of the fairest in the eyes of the daughters of Cain, so that the daughters of Cain lusted after the sons of Seth like ravenous beasts, and the sons of Seth after the daughters of Cain, until they committed abomination with them.

  2. Job 1:6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
    Deu 16:16 Three times in a year shall all thy males appear before the LORD thy God in the place which he shall choose; in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of tabernacles: and they shall not appear before the LORD empty:
    (Joh 1:12) But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

    (Rom 8:14) For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

    (Rom 8:19) For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.

    (Php 2:15) That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;

    (1Jn 3:1) Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

    (1Jn 3:2) Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

    I do not think Scripture says anywhere that the sons of God ARE the fallen angels. Angels neither marry nor are given in marriage. Also, the offspring of the sons of God and women of earth produced men of renown, men of old…. We know the sons of Adam lived to be of great age as opposed to men of earth, who were given an average of 120 years of life.
    Remember, Adam and Eve were EXILED from Paradise around 4004 B. C. It was not the year of their creation (or the earth’s), but when they began their MORTAL life on earth. In Paradise they were immortal. On earth, Adam and Eve became mortal and married into 6th day man already thriving on earth. Scripture does not reveal how long they lived in Paradise, but according to Ussher’s Chronology of the ages of the patriarchs, Adam’s life on earth began around 4004 B. C.
    Plus, if you believe the earth is a mere 6000 years old, you are in error with the rest. The earth was created on the Third Day. That means if one is to believe a day is 1000 years, then earth must be older. If 4004 B. C. is the sixth day, then one must add 3000 more years because of the Third Day. That makes it at least 12,000 years old – if one believes in the day/year formula. (If the sixth day equals 4000 B. C. then we add those 4000 years to 6000 years (6th day), making a total of 10,000 years. Add 2015 totals 12,015 years.
    Cain’s wife was from man already on earth. Archaeological evidence shows man has been around far longer than a mere 6000 years.

    • I understand what you are saying here, but unfortunately it is not complicated enough. I know you think it is, and I know this is an affront to you, but you are just wrong in your assertions, and your thoughts. Though at first light they may seem good, they are actually not complex enough.

      The author of the article did in fact answer all of your points, but you might not have picked up on it.

      Just one – After Jesus came and finished his redeeming work, that in fact made it possible for us (we as humans) to be called son’s of God – Christ made that possible.

      Your reference to Job is (based on the original language and cooborating verses in the OT) is talking about Angels presenting themselves; not men. (“And Satan was also there” – this illudes to an extended thought I have, but I will not go into it here). But the original language term for Job’s “Son’s” reference is the word for angels, and not for men.

      Your Deut reference does not have an actual reference to the “Son of God”, and so therefore it is mute.

      But again, it is Christ who gives us the right to be called the children of God – and the Bible is clear about that. He made it possible, and before his redeeming work, it was not.

      Also – one last thing – Luke does a great job of delineating the difference between terms in the genealogy listing – all men are referred to as the son of this man or that, but Adam is referred to as a Son of God – for the simple fact that he was a direct creation of God, and not a direct creation of an earthly “father”. Again and again, it was Christ who gives us the right to be called the Son’s of God; the Children of God.

  3. Doug,
    I just watched your YouTube video lecture concerning this and I agree with your analysis. However, you didn’t address the easiest explanation of why the “Sons of Seth and Daughters of Cain” theory is completely wrong. Since there were giants both before and after the flood, how could anyone say that it was the corrupted line of Cain’s offspring that produced the giants when after the flood, there wasn’t a line of Cain ANYMORE!!! They all perished in the flood. So what created the giants after the flood if they were originally created from the now extinct line of Cain? There is no argument, the line of Cain had nothing to do with the generation of the giants.
    Additionally, if you look at this from a scientific viewpoint, how does the offspring of a man and a woman produce a race of giants. It does not happen. Yes there are genetic defects that produce a disease known as gigantism in humans, however, this is extremely rare and those that suffer from this disease are basically disabled by the disease, rarely live to an old age, are no where near the size of the giants listed in the Bible and certainly couldn’t possibly be considered warriors capable of fighting (most of them have arthritis so bad they can barely walk). So the human male/female production of giants theory doesn’t hold water from a scientific POV. In order to produce a giant, one of the strains of DNA had to be from a non-human source.
    Another topic that you really didn’t address was how rampant the spread of the race of giants was worldwide. I have talked to people before that bring up the question of how a giant of the size listed in the Bible could possibly then mate with an ordinary human woman and create an entire race of giants? It does raise an interesting logistical question until they realize that not every giant that was born from a fallen angel/human woman pairing was born a male. There have been numerous skeletal finds of female giants in excess of 12 foot tall. They for all intents and purposes became the offspring of Satan prophesied in Gen. 3:15. The race of giants fulfilled the prophesy of the enmity between the seed (offspring) of woman and the seed (offspring) of Satan. Since they came into existence, Satan has been using them to try to destroy or corrupt the line of man.
    Additionally, I have often wondered why so little emphasis is placed on the very important description of Noah in Gen. 6:9, “Noah was a just man and PERFECT in his generations”.
    The phrase “perfect in his generations” screams out to me that Noah’s genetic blood line had not been corrupted by inbreeding with fallen angels. As patriarch of his family, if his bloodline was uncorrupted, then his sons and their wives should also be pure. Only eight pure bloodlines were allowed on the ark in order to destroy the work of the fallen angels and their leader, Satan.

    • I am in agreement with you. For sure.

      I just wanted to somehow simply add.

      Simply put…

      1. Angels mate with human women.

      2. Produce Nephs

      3. Those Nephs produce other.

      My thought are (regarding your size question) –
      Angels (who can take our form) are not necessarily “tall” or “tallER”. And so therefore COULD infact mate w humans.


      People were in those days… just larger and taller than we are, and there is Biblical evidence to support this.


      Nephs, the NON-angels but only their Offspring, (and as you suggested) produced large females, and so on and so forth.

      Etc etc, ad infinitum the possibilities.

      As you know, the Bible does say “those were the men of renown – the great men of old”. I believe that refers especially to those first sets of offspring. “In those days” – and “those were the great men of old” etc etc. I believe the “afterward” sets …. were just Goliath-types, and well… that’s where I’ll stop.

      … except I’ll add, science (as you may know) has shown that the atmospheric conditions after the flood would not have supported.. SUPER largeness. …12, 13, 15 feet maybe, but not SUPER large (which is what I believe was the case before the flood – I also believe certain things about the biology of bones before the flood – But I won’t go into that here).

      To close out, and I know you know this – it was after the flood that God said our years would go down – 120, etc – and this is dynamic in the conversation, imho.

  4. One of the best treatise of this topic.

  5. The nephilim were the original giants created by union of earth women and the 200 fallen angels that fell through ‘lust’ as accurately described in the Book of Enoch, who were drowned in the flood, but some did survive the Great Flood. These were the 15+ to 36 feet tall giants; then, when, these mated amongst themselves, they created the under size 15 feet tall giants called the raphiem. Just Google photos of giants on YouTube.com and judge for yourself. Sadly, this news piece leaves out this vital info….

  6. I hate to break it to those who believe the torah,bible or koran. These creation stories were copied from ancient Sumerians, from over 2000 years earlier.
    The so-called book of Daniel was written/copied around 500BCE. Just the knowledge of “mixing” of the elements tells the reader what era in which it was written. Daniel was not privy to bronze if he is porported to live in approx 1500BCE, or earlier.
    The story of Babel is clearly mistranslated. The “gods” came down to destroy the launch pad that can be clearly found in Lebenon today. These 1000 ton slabs of granite later became the temple of Jupiter.
    The attempt of “satan” to cut off the seedline of a messiah is also a fairytale. Have you ever wondered why the forgeries called the New Testament try so hard to link Joseph to the bloodine of David? I think the forgers in Mathew attempts to link 14 ancestors to David. And Mark attempts to link 43 ancestors to David.
    Then when you read more into the forgeries. You find that Christ (Jesus) was CONCIEVED through an angel, not Joseph. Why do the forgers of the New Testament attempt, in vain no less, to link Christ (Jesus) to David? When you can honestly answer these questions. You will begin to see how the Babylonian Mystery became what is called Christianity today.
    Mankind must break free of these superstious stories and contol paradighms!

    • And I hate… well, no actually I take great pleasure in telling you that you are misinformed.  There IS no evidence to back up your claims;  these are merely Your ideas and conclusions.  
      The elements are not ‘mixed’ in Daniel as a careful study will quickly tell you.  There are many desertions written on this subject conveying ample provable evidence to bake up their claims.
      Your information regarding the tower of Babel is from who – the gods themselves??  The men of earth were building a portal to heaven – yes a door for the occult.  No surprise or new information there sorry.
      I wonder who you are and what qualifies you to decide that the Bible is a forgery?  You have offered no evidence other than your own assertions based on your own summations of a book you clearly don’t understand.
      Jesus Christ was conceived by the Holy Spirit as the Bible clearly states.
      Your questions are not really questions are they?!, but your own beliefs which are stated without credence.
      As for me, I know and love and serve YHWH, Having met Him, and knowing countless others who also have had the privilege of knowing Him personally, your puny arguments don’t amount to anything even close to a rebuttal of the truth He has revealed in His Holy Word – For HIS People.  Clearly not you – yet.
       I do not give up hope for you Markp67, and pray that the scales will drop form your eyes and you will see the truth before it is too late.
      BTW, I find it laughable that you believe you have more freedom without Jesus than we do with Him. It aint true! 🙂 

    • In my own experience of the Knowledge of God (an hour per day turning within and much more over the last 40 years) the source of history’s folly lies in the knowledge of good and evil. Of course The Knowledge of God resides and has never left within that package, but the ability to distinguish one from the other, comes from the gift of revelation (in your terminology) in an unending succession of Gift Givers. There is but one living at a time and none are beholden to any religion. Their individual claims IF a public offering is made are backed up by a proof so to speak within the individual who both receives and devotes time to this acceptance, mostly within themselves. An hour a day of entrance and the welcome perception of innate Joy and Gratitude is a fair price- maybe too fair when we each get 24hrs of life in a day. It becomes easy to see then the various misrepresentations, misinterpretation and the various social agendas of religious and philosophical thinking. One of the disturbing realizations I have come across in my journey is the squelching by the RCC of the fact that Jesus as the Christ of his limited time, continuously addressed the place within listeners where the soul and the Alpha and Omega reside together (innate life) and spoke to the understanding of that, also including a number of times that He was not the first or the last (Christ) to offer direct access to this union. And that was physically confirmed by a Vatican translator (interesting personal interview). Morals and ethics are inherent within this experience of “Self Knowledge aka KoG or Heaven, and still mistakes and bad decisions exist, but the fruit of this union never has to end. The knowledge of good and evil as a basis of understanding has NEVER helped our race to live in the source of Peace… which is possible to this very day for all who really want to know, who truly thirst for the ‘water of life’.

      • Also…so much has been hypothesized about the Holy Name Of God…does it not ring a bell somewhere inside each of us even conceptually, that maybe, just maybe the Name of God is ‘spoken’ silently in each and every breath that we are given? To have the possibility of intimately knowing that which gives us life is the the greatest choice before us, a gift that the gift of Life itself may hold most dear. Choose wisely!!

  7. Every religion has its own belief. According to ISLAM the population of the creatures other than the humans and the creatures we can see (animals) is two times more than us. Now if i talk about these giants, ADAM and EVE were the biggest humans alive. Its said that MOSES was feet tall .Slowly the humans gained or actually lost the height. And here we are now.
    And as far as the SATAN is concerned according to the teachings of ISLAM when a baby is born along with him are born an angel and a demon. The demon persuades him to do sins while the angel reminds him of the difference between good and bad. And thats how things are done.

  8. Look in the Mirror

    How about reading the book “The Real Devil”. Do a google search. It’s free and wakes you up to the reality.

  9. It would be correct to say all humans (hu–spirit) are from Adam. It would be incorrect to state all bipeds on earth are human. Adam had a racial makeup and it would be against like for like, kind for kind and seed for seed which God authored, to suggest that all races came from Adam.

  10. I find a lot of people interchange the word jew or jewish for Hebrew and also to describe the other tribes of the House of Israel. This is incorrect. Daniel was Hebrew and Judean. The remaining 10 tribes never referred to themselves as jews.

  11. …”that are kept in chains of darkness reserved for judgment”… If this is in fact the case, why and how do we see the continuation of these giants even after the flood in the time of Joshua and so on? And recurring again in the end times? Are these ‘angels/demons/sons of God continuing to fall and mingle with women on a regular basis?

    • When Lucifer rebelled against the Godhead, he convinced and/or coerced 1/3 of the “angels” to follow his lead. And war broke out in the heavens. Of that portion of Creation that was devastated by the war, God restored during the Six Days. And on the Sixth Day, the Godhead created Mankind – Adam and Eve.

      God’s Plan A for Mankind was always to rule and reign, as priests and kings, along with His Only Begotten Son, over ALL Creation – including over Lucifer and all under his dominion.

      As Mankind was meant to be the direct seed line of the Godhead, it became Lucifer/Satan’s primary mission to despoil that seed line – and certainly, after Adam and Eve had sinned, for the purpose of preventing the Messiah (Jesus – Lucifer’s former best friend, now Satan’s worst enemy) from coming forth through the seed of the woman.

      If the Messiah could be prevented from coming forth into our realm, then there would be no salvation for Mankind – and God’s seed line would die and remain dead.

      But there was a secondary purpose in Lucifer/Satan’s plans to despoil Mankind, and that was, if he couldn’t prevent the Messiah from coming forth, then if the “fallen angels” could inhabit fit human extensions to where they could be regarded as “Mankind”, then God could not judge them as “fallen angels”, but consider them as possible recipients of salvation through Christ along with regular Mankind.

      How repugnant that would be! That dirty, vile, darker than dark fallen angels, who hijacked human DNA form and life – the Godhead’s direct seed line DNA “image and likeness” – be given the same consideration unto salvation through Christ Jesus! When Lucifer/Satan and the fallen angels were the reason for all the chaos and confusion, without form and void, mess (Gen 1:2) in the first place!

      Out of the 1/3 of the angels that rebelled, not all of them “came down unto the daughters of men” during the pre-Flood era. But for those who did, they were judged during the Flood, and bound in “chains of darkness”.

      The Flood also wiped out the Nephilim and other human-alien hybrids, as well as human-animal hybrids, alien-animal hybrids, and all other perverse “life forms” that had been brought forth. Also wiped out were those who were considered “good persons”, but who refused to pay heed to Noah’s warnings.

      The Flood was world-wide. Since then, there has never again been a world-wide flood. There have been massive regional floods and local floods, but never again a world-wide flood.

      There are some researchers who believe that some of the fallen “watchers” and their “Nephilim” offspring escaped the Flood by taking up residence deep in the Earth (much like the Deep Underground Military Bases and other type underground shelters of today), only to re-emerge after the Flood receded and the Earth dried out, and once again proceeded to corrupt Mankind’s DNA.

      This theory is possible, but how probable (likely) is open for debate, because when the “fountains of the deep” broke forth in the run up to the Flood and during, this implies massive earthquakes and earth changes, even deep underground changes, powerful enough to destroy underground shelters.

      However, there is another theory that is based solidly on Scripture, but is most often overlooked as an explanation. And that is ..

      the Tower of Babel.

      The first 9 verses of chapter 11 in Genesis (9-11!) tell of a short but telling story of an important segment of Mankind’s history.

      The Tower of Babel is often confused as occurring during the Empire of Babylon (of Daniel’s day). Or perhaps, earlier during the time of Sumeria and Mesopotamia. But the Tower of Babel most definitely occurred much earlier than those empires of latter years.

      The most telling verse within those 9 verses of Genesis chapter 11 is the 6th verse (which ties in with the 6th chapter of Genesis) :

      “And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.”

      The people of the “Tower of Babel” era were not primitive nomads. Nor were they of the advanced Empire of Babylon, nor of the preceding advanced Sumeria and Mesopotamia.

      The people of the Tower of Babel era were on the threshold of unlimited capability and power – ANYTHING within their imaginations. This is talking about a technologically advanced civilization! Perhaps moreso than we today!

      Neither Sumeria, nor Mesopotamia, nor the Empire of Babylon were technologically advanced to the degree that ANYTHING within their imaginations was possible! Nor were all the peoples of all these various empires “one” with a one-world language, nor with a one-world government, nor led by a one-world ruler.

      But the Tower of Babel era was just that: a one-world people, a one-world language, and a one-world government, headed by the anti-christ of his day: Nimrod!

      What we are witnessing today is the re-emergence of the Tower of Babel and the utilization of the ancient Tower Technologies, in order to open the dimensional gateways, in order for Lucifer/Satan and his hordes to re-wage their ancient “war in the heavens” against the Godhead.

      We know that Jesus said, “As in the days of Noah”. Much/most of what Jesus said and did has not been passed on down to us today. So he may have also said – pure conjecture at this point of course – “As in the days of the Tower of Babel”.

      Picture Nimrod and his top advisors and scientists re-activating the pre-Flood Nephilim DNA, injecting the alien DNA into their own, becoming “fit extensions”
      for direct demon co-possession in human host bodies (getting massively “juiced up”), as well as once again for more of the fallen angel “watchers” to “come down unto the daughters of men and beget giants”.

      It would only be natural for Nimrod and his corrupted society to desire to recapture what used to be in pre-Flood times – when men and women could live “like gods”! And once the technology for doing so was developed, it became possible to do so .. and much more.

      When God came down and destroyed the Tower, confused the one-world language, and punished the people, He had already promised to not wipe out everything/everyone by a universal flood again. Yet, the devastation was immense on a world scale. Even so, some of the alien-Nephilim seed survived.

      And so we finally catch up to this alien-Nephilim seed in the time of Moses and Joshua. And most likely, as the fossil record has shown, there were other habitations of giants around the world during the time of Moses and Joshua.

      The desires and plans of Lucifer/Satan and the fallen angels to corrupt Mankind – the direct seed line DNA “image and likeness” of the Godhead – has been an ongoing assault pre-Flood and post-Flood, and even into our own times.

      And it is about to be unleashed upon Mankind once again without restraint. Only those who are covered by, and adhere to, the Blood of Jesus will survive this last days assault against Mankind (Rev 12:11).

      Unless those days be cut short ..

  12. Thank you, Doug. I have been studying this subject for over 20 years and your work is very helpful to me.

    God bless,


  13. I certainly agree with your conclusion that the sons of God were fallen angels and not the sons of Seth. However, I’d like you to consider the study below. Fallen angels and demons are not the same thing exactly. Demons are the spirits of the offspring of the fallen angels and women. You can find evidence of this view in the writings of the early church. Please consider the study below. It is in three parts which are linked at the top of the page, just over half way down the list.

    Enjoy, and good article!


  14. Michael James Stone

    Praise the Lord Doug, looks good.

    A little curious on use of w in yud hey vav hey, was that for common readership? And when you said “ALL” in sentence 2, is that also for readership? (smile) I’m not nitpicking just observations from an editor at one time and writer.

    I am praying for your book and success and that you keep your students on their toes as they do you.

    Blessings Bro,

    • Hi Michael, I used “YHWH” because it is the common usage. I realize that the actual pronunciation is a “v” sound – but it is hard to change everyone 🙂 – thanks for the other issue. I will work on that.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: